Skip to content
calcbloc
BURN MULTIPLE / STARTUP

Burn multiple calculator

Divide net burn by net new ARR to get your burn multiple, and see where it falls on David Sacks's scale from amazing (under 1×) to bad (over 3×).

Written by Reviewed by TODO Reviewer NameLast verified Updated

Your details

01Same period (quarter or year)

Burn multiple

2.00×

Suspect: $2.00 burned for each $1 of new ARR

Rating
Suspect
Net burn
$2,000,000
Net new ARR
$1,000,000
  • Burn multiple = net burn ÷ net new ARR, both over the same period (a quarter or a year). It measures how much cash a startup spends to add each unit of annual recurring revenue; lower is better.
  • Net burn is cash spent minus cash revenue collected. Net new ARR is ending ARR minus starting ARR: new and expansion revenue less churn and contraction.
  • The bands are rules of thumb for venture-stage startups. Very early companies often run higher multiples, and the same multiple means more at scale.

Burn multiple: 2.00× Suspect: $2.00 burned for each $1 of new ARR

Burn multiple = net burn ÷ net new ARR
Show the breakdownAmount
Net burn in the period$2,000,000
Net new ARR in the period$1,000,000
Burn multiple2

David Sacks's rules of thumb

Burn multipleEfficiency
Under 1×Amazing
1× to 1.5×Great
1.5× to 2×Good
2× to 3×Suspect
Over 3×Bad

2.00×

Suspect: $2.00 burned for each $1 of new ARR

How it's calculated

The burn multiple measures how efficiently a startup turns cash into growth: how many dollars it burns for each dollar of annual recurring revenue it adds. David Sacks of Craft Ventures introduced it in 2020 as "Burn Multiple = Net Burn / Net New ARR", an annualised version of his "hype ratio".David Sacks, Craft Ventures Because it counts all spending against all net new ARR, it captures the efficiency of the whole company, not just of sales and marketing.

The formula

Burn multiple = net burn ÷ net new ARR, over the same period

  • Net burn = cash spent − cash revenue collected
  • Net new ARR = ARR at the end − ARR at the start (new + expansion − churn − contraction)

Sacks's rules of thumb for venture-stage startups: under 1× amazing, 1× to 1.5× great, 1.5× to 2× good, 2× to 3× suspect, over 3× bad.

Worked example

Burning $2 million in a year while ARR grows by $1 million is a burn multiple of 2.00×, rated Suspect. Sacks uses this same example and calls 2× reasonable for an early-stage startup.

$2 million burn, $1 million net new ARRBURN MULTIPLE / STARTUP
LineAmount
Net burn in the period$2,000,000
Net new ARR in the period$1,000,000
Burn multiple2

Adding $1.6 million of ARR on the same burn improves it to 1.25× (Great).

Assumptions and limitations

  • Use the same period for burn and ARR growth; a single quarter can be noisy, so many teams look at a trailing year.
  • Not meaningful when ARR shrinks. If net new ARR is zero or negative, the company is burning without growing.
  • Rules of thumb, not laws. Earlier companies typically run higher multiples; compare yourself with companies at a similar stage.
FAQ

Questions people ask

What is the burn multiple?

The burn multiple is net burn divided by net new ARR over the same period: how many dollars a startup spends to add one dollar of annual recurring revenue. David Sacks of Craft Ventures introduced it in 2020 as a measure of capital efficiency. Lower is better.

What is a good burn multiple?

David Sacks's rules of thumb for venture-stage startups are: under 1× amazing, 1 to 1.5× great, 1.5 to 2× good, 2 to 3× suspect and over 3× bad. A company that burns $2 million to add $1 million of ARR has a burn multiple of 2, which he describes as reasonable for an early-stage startup.

How do you calculate net new ARR?

Net new ARR is ARR at the end of the period minus ARR at the start: new customers plus expansion, minus churn and contraction. Use the same period as for net burn, such as a quarter or a year.

What if ARR did not grow?

If net new ARR is zero or negative, the burn multiple is not meaningful: the company is spending without adding recurring revenue. That is a warning sign in itself; look at churn and new sales separately to see what is happening.

How is the burn multiple different from CAC payback?

CAC payback looks only at sales and marketing spend against new customers. The burn multiple includes all spending, including product, engineering and overheads, and nets off all revenue, so it measures the efficiency of the whole company rather than of customer acquisition alone.

Sources

  1. David Sacks, Craft VenturesThe Burn Multiple (23 April 2020) · retrieved 2026-10-20

Written by Reviewed by TODO Reviewer NameLast verified Updated

How every figure is checked: methodology.